GoPro Camera Page Redesign

Company

GoPro

Role

Lead Product Designer

Length

6 months

Team

User Research, Product, Operations, Creative/Studio

Year

2024-2025

Background

The product detail pages for GoPro's cameras were initially designed to consolidate extensive information about core camera offerings and subscriptions into a single page.


As the company sought to expand its product lineup, the eCommerce team recognized the need for a new product detail page design that could scale effectively while enhancing the overall user experience.

Overview

Problems

Improve conversion and revenue for camera product details pages.


Information overload and not scalable for future product offerings.

Solution

Focused “buy” and “learn” pages that allow users to focus either on exploring camera features or buying options.


User friction was reduced and user engagement increased.

Combined Learn + Buy journeys on one page.

A big block of text + Over 80% drop out rate.

Separated Learn + Buy journeys for a more focused user experience.

Increase in checkout rate from the Product Details page by 19%.

Process

Path to a more scalable, compelling website

01

INitial user research

UX pain points + Gopro.com perceptions

02

Desk research

Existing research insights

03

Competitive audit

PDP COPY, VISUALS, INFO HIERARCHY + q&a SEMANTIC ANALYSIS

04

Design + Iteration

UX exploration + optimization

05

impact evaluation

evaluation of success

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Goals + Initial Pain Points

Understanding the user and business problems

As a team we aligned on business objectives and identified design goals that would help us achieve those objectives.


We also looked at analytic data to help us identify the most impactful areas of the experience to improve.

Boost Revenue

=

Improved Conversion

+

Optimize XSell

+

Increase AOV

Improved Conversion

=

Pain Points

Reduce Friction

Nearly 1 in 4 purchase intenders end up not making a purchase decision

Can’t find specs

Can’t find info needed

Feel too long to scroll

Inefficient/ effective nav

Maintain Engagement

Nearly 85% of users drop off before seeing content modules

Users lose interest in PDPs

Boring, mediocre

Text heavy

Irrelevant / too action-driven

Provide Sufficient Info

Not sure what else I should buy

Not sure what’s included already

Not sure if GoPro Subscription is mandatory

Goals

Improve navigation to optimize information discovery

Improve content layout to help shoppers locate information

Reduce bounce by

Surfacing exciting contents up front

Removing blocks of text (especially on mobile)

Offering more use cases

Surface Shop by Activity + top selling accessories

Surface “Whats’ Included”

Offer scalable UX to future proof it

Nearly no one is buying recommended items from the intersitial

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Desk Research

Learning best practices

Approach

  • Documented + evaluated against best practices from Baymard Institutes + NNg Research findings

Goals + Rationales

  • Rely on established e-comm industry standards to identify and reduce UX frictionCreate stakeholder buy-in for backlog prioritization

  • Reduce redundancy in research to speed up the process

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Competitive Audit

Exploring current patterns

Approach

  • Go beyond the basic e-comm experience and examine how e-commerce websites tell a product story + structure their content

Methods

  • Broaden perspectives + identify best-in-class practices

    • Identify effective UX patterns to explore + test

  • Learn how other companies address user needs

    • Audit pros and cons through comparison to mitigate risks

  • Gain inspiration

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Design + Iterate

Iterative design and qualitative testing

We conducted 4 rounds of unmoderated small sample usability testing on to optimize the new UX.

  • Full Page vs Drawer

  • Desktop Navigation

  • Mobile Navigation

  • Buy Page Layout

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Test 1: Full page vs Drawer

First round of concept testing

From the desk research and competitive audit it was clear that splitting up the current camera product page design into two separate pages (“Shop” and “Learn”) was an option worth exploring.


I created many different designs and socialized them via internal reviews to align on two we wanted to bring into testing.


The two finalists were:

Separate full pages

“Buy” page as a sliding drawer

We learned that both patterns performed well and there weren’t any major usability problems with either of the concepts.


Next steps were to investigate if either of the concepts served an advantage from an implementation or SEO perspective.

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Test 2: Navigation

2nd Mobile and Desktop Variants

Now that we know splitting up the pages performed well in user testing we wanted to make sure the navigational paths between pages were optimized.


We tested desktop variants and mobile patterns separately to understand which patterns worked best for each device.

Mobile

Top navigation bar

Bottom navigation bar

Bottom navigation bar + side “Jump to” chapters

Top navigation bar + side “Jump to” chapters

Desktop

Top navigation bar

Bottom navigation bar

Bottom navigation bar + side “Jump to” chapters

Top navigation bar + pill “Jump to” chapters

Winners

Bottom navigation bar

Top navigation bar + pill “Jump to” chapters

Overall the top nav design with visible subpage with chapter links below performed best in testing because it aligned best with user mental models. Users also really valued having the price visible on the first “Learn” page as well.

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Test 3: Buy Mode + Interstitial

Testing the best purchase path

We also tested different “Buy” and interstitial designs so see which formats were the most effective at providing add to cart confirmation and upsell.

Four Desktop “Buy” page + Interstitial Variants

Overall Winner

Overall the top nav design with visible subpage with chapter links below performed best in testing because it aligned best with user mental models.


Users also really valued having the price visible on the first “Learn” page as well.

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact evaluation

Pre-Launch Experiment

Larger Sample Size Validation, n=240

Goals

Evaluate the new UX against the current UX to identify improvements and ensure a better user experience.

Identify any overlooked UX problems.

Old Design

New Design

The same copy, imagery, and content order were used to reduce confounding factors** (Except for the HERO image in the current design)

Key Hypothesis

Hypothesis #1

After exposure, those who were assigned to the challenger design will show more interest in a GoPro camera than those who saw the control design.

Hypothesis #2

The challenger design is significantly easier to learn about the H12 camera than the control design.

Hypothesis #3

The challenger design leads to significantly favorable impressions of the website (e.g., easier to use, less confusing, more exciting etc.)

Findings

The key three hypotheses were supported.

The same content / amount of info was presented the challenger design led to:

Significantly higher interest level post-exposure

Significantly higher perceived learning effectiveness

Significantly better impressions

Through sentiment maps, we’ve identified what worked well + what users expected improvement.

Tweaked UX based on both pros + cons including UX writing

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact

Before and After

Overview of general structural changes

Before

Learn + Buy journeys are combined in one page.

A big block of text -- Over 80% drop out rate.

Learn

Buy

After

Separated Learn + buy journeys for a more focused user experience

Learn

Buy

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact

Before and After: Buy

Redesign summary for the buy page

Before

Core page requirements were taken from the original page and adapted in the redesign

After

Carefully considered content presentation

What’s included clearly visible

Collapsed bundle section for future scalability

Mouse movement is also carefully considered.

(Top --> Bottom)

Subscription + Free shipping info above the fold

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact

Before and After: Interstitial

Redesign summary for the interstitial page

Before

Small and crowded interstitial with upsell cut off below the fold at smaller breakpoints.

Nearly 0% conversion

After

Carefully considered content presentation

Use of color to highlight what’s added

Personalization via the Shop by Activity experience*

Camera specific accessories

Key revenue booster items

01

Initial research

02

desk research

03

competitive audit

04

design iteration

05

impact

Impact at a Glance

Looking at the numbers post launch

We lose 80% of traffic on the 8th module down the page

Checkout to Purchase:

Up 19%

PDP to Add to Cart:

Down 29%

Add to Cart to Checkout Starts:

Down 6%

Note: This was a huge improvement! We used to lose 80% of people before they get to the first content module.

Overall, our team deemed the project a success.

Our solution was less effective for unqualified traffic—visitors with little intent to purchase—but performed well for qualified traffic—those serious about buying. The introduction of the "Learn" page added a step in the user flow, which deterred unqualified visitors. However, for qualified visitors, this additional content increased their likelihood to purchase.


It also set the stage for our next step: How might we drive more traffic to the Buy page.

What’s Next?

Our team wanted to keep the redesign, but improve the traffic to the Buy page.


How might we...

Drive more traffic to the Buy page from other pages of the website?

Drive more traffic to the Buy page from the Learn page?

Bring more attention to the Buy button on the Learn page?


Currently different designs are being reviewed and tested to address these areas of improvement.

Check it out in the wild

Open to work

Back to top

Back to top

Let's create
something
extraordinary
together.

Let’s make an impact

Alyssa O'Neill

Senior Product Designer

Hit me up if you're looking for a natural collaborator and thorough problem solver passionate about crafting design solutions with empathy.

Open to work

Back to top

Back to top

Let's create
something
extraordinary
together.

Let’s make an impact

Alyssa O'Neill

Senior Product Designer

Hit me up if you're looking for a natural collaborator and thorough problem solver passionate about crafting design solutions with empathy.

Open to work

Back to top

Back to top

Let's create
something
extraordinary
together.

Let’s make an impact

Alyssa O'Neill

Senior Product Designer

Hit me up if you're looking for a natural collaborator and thorough problem solver passionate about crafting design solutions with empathy.